public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: delay protected clocks until arch initcall
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:38:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160127203816.GU4317@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7334994.mKnQpNNMP2@diego>

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:14:17PM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2016, 16:37:22 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > I thought the patches were simply dropped and the
> > rockchip people just took another approach.
> 
> nope still on track ... especially as it was Stephen's believe that orphans 
> shouldn't even be usable to general clock users :-).
> 
> I just remember that the proposed general solution was based on Mike's 
> upcoming generic critical clock handling (the handoff thingy), which would 
> move critical clock handling out of architecture-specific code, so I've been 
> prodding Mike mainly.
> 
> Another option might be to allow clock-controllers to handle orphans and only 
> deny orphan usage to outside clock users, maybe expanding on what I did with 
> the clock-conf part in patch2.

I'm not sure that would solve anything in our case. All our clocks
drivers are different ones, so I'm not sure how we could handle that.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160127/01f08228/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-27 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-21 14:10 [PATCH 0/2] defer clk_gets on orphan clocks Emilio López
2016-01-21 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: delay protected clocks until arch initcall Emilio López
2016-01-27 15:37   ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 16:14     ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-27 20:38       ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2016-01-27 21:07         ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-27 18:53     ` Emilio López
2016-02-01 19:32       ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-21 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: defer clk_gets on orphan clocks Emilio López
2016-01-28  8:23   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-28  9:03     ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-29 19:54       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160127203816.GU4317@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox