From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:00:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] clk: ti: omap3+: dpll: use non-locking version of
 clk_get_rate
In-Reply-To: <56AA6261.7030503@ti.com>
References: <1453981067-8618-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com>
 <56A9FED1.3090903@ti.com> <20160128172215.GD19432@atomide.com>
 <56AA6261.7030503@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20160128190026.GI19432@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [160128 10:48]:
> On 01/28/2016 07:22 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [160128 03:44]:
> >>On 01/28/2016 01:37 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> >>>As the code in this file is being executed within irq context in some
> >>>cases, we must avoid the clk_get_rate which uses mutex internally.
> >>>Switch the code to use clk_hw_get_rate instead which is non-locking.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> >>
> >>Ooops, sorry. Sent wrong version (read: old) of this patch, please ignore
> >>this one. Will re-send the correct version in a bit.
> >
> >I think this is still needed as a fix for -rc cycle with cc: stable
> >as otherwise we have omap4 and 5 hang if PM runtime is enabled before
> >a suspend/resume cycle?
> 
> Look at the other patch I sent, it should accomplish the same thing, and
> more.
> 
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-clk/msg06094.html

Right.. But is that suitable for the -rc cycle with cc stable?

You should also describe the bug it causes in the change log.
Something like:

This fixes an issue where PM runtime will hang the system if
enabled with a serial console before a suspend-resume cycle.

Regards,

Tony