From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] irq/mbigen:Fix the problem of IO remap for duplicated physical address in mbigen driver
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:25:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201132557.GG674@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56AF585E.6050005@huawei.com>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:06:38PM +0800, majun (F) wrote:
>
>
> ? 2016/2/1 19:57, Mark Rutland ??:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:44:54PM +0800, MaJun wrote:
> >> From: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> For mbigen module, there is a special case that more than one mbigen
> >> device nodes use the same reg definition in DTS when these devices
> >> exist in the same mbigen hardware module.
> >>
> >> mbigen_dev1:intc_dev1 {
> >> ...
> >> reg = <0x0 0xc0080000 0x0 0x10000>;
> >> ...
> >> };
> >>
> >> mbigen_dev2:intc_dev2 {
> >> ...
> >> reg = <0x0 0xc0080000 0x0 0x10000>;
> >> ...
> >> };
> >
> > This doesn't sound right. If they exist in the same place, and have the
> > same reg, they _are_ the same device.
> >
> > You'll need to explain this better.
> >
>
> For a mbigen hardware module which connecte with several devices,
> because these devices has different device ID,
> I need to define a device node for each device in DTS file.
>
> mbigen
> |
> ------------------
> | | |
> dev1 dev2 dev3
>
> Because of register layout,the registers related with these devices
> are put together, I can't split them clearly.
> So, I only make these devices which connect with
> same mbigen hardware module usethe same address.
This sounds like we've either mis-described the mbigen in the binding,
or we're mis-describing the relationship with the devices.
It should not be necessary to describe the same set of registers
repeatedly.
> >> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> - mgn_chip->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> >> + mgn_chip->base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
> >
> > These two behaving differently doesn't seem correct either...
>
> The problem is caused by memory region check fail because of
> duplicated address in devm_ioremap_resource().
The check is sensible. Using devm_ioremap rather than
devm_ioremap_resource to avoid the check is not the correct solution.
> For mbigen special case, there is no necessary to do this check.
I'm not sure I fully agree.
Regardless, this is not the right solution; it is fragile at best.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 11:44 [RFC PATCH] irq/mbigen:Fix the problem of IO remap for duplicated physical address in mbigen driver MaJun
2016-02-01 11:57 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-01 13:06 ` majun (F)
2016-02-01 13:25 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-02-02 10:25 ` majun (F)
2016-02-02 11:43 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-03 2:31 ` majun (F)
2016-02-03 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-16 7:54 ` majun (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160201132557.GG674@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).