From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 11/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun8i-a23-mbus-clk using the simpler composite clk
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:24:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201202458.GJ4652@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v658SFy6SF87=obYLW1YAxvk0T4dRuBU-F1oLT3Yq=PgTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:41:33AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:15:47PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> sun8i-a23-mbus-clk used sunxi's factors clk, which is nice for very
> >> complicated clocks, but is not really needed here.
> >>
> >> Convert sun8i-a23-mbus-clk to use clk_composite, as it is a gate + mux
> >> + divider. This makes the code easier to understand.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> > Maxime
>
> Given your suggestion for extending and generalizing factors clk
> clock rate calculations, maybe we just leave this one out and use
> the new stuff later?
My suggestion was only about the core of the clk-factors, the
"external" API would not change, so I'm guessing it's still relevant.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160201/78d4db1a/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 13:15 [PATCH RFC 00/11] clk: sunxi: factors clk clean up and refactor Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] clk: composite: Add unregister function Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Make struct clk_factors_config table const Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:50 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Add clk cleanup in sunxi_factors_register() error path Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Add unregister function Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:52 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 18:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] clk: sunxi: unmap registers in sunxi_factors_clk_setup if register call fails Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:52 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Consolidate get_factors parameters into a struct Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Support custom formulas Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Drop round_rate from clk ops Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:33 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk using factors clk with custom recalc Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun6i-ar100 using factors clk Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:47 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-31 16:59 ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-02-05 13:03 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-02-02 15:55 ` [PATCH] clk: sunxi: don't mark sun6i_ar100_data __initconst Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-02 17:33 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun8i-a23-mbus-clk using the simpler composite clk Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-28 2:41 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-02-01 20:24 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2016-01-27 19:13 ` [PATCH RFC 00/11] clk: sunxi: factors clk clean up and refactor Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160201202458.GJ4652@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).