linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm, gic-v3: require that reserved cells are always 0
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:40:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160203184017.GA15852@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160203182054.GH1234@leverpostej>

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:20:54PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:00:58PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Consequently, any extensions to the PPI or SPI interrupt specifiers must
> > be able to work with random crap from legacy DTs, effectively
> > necessitating a new interrupt type in the first cell. Sigh.
> 
> I'm not sure that's true if we allocate a new value for the 1st cell for
> "extended" PPI or SPI interrupt-sepcficiers (which presumably add
> restrictions). That would also allow old kernels to safely skip such
> interrupts rather than mis-parsing them.

Right, that's what I said :)

> > This patch fixes the text so that additional, reserved cells are
> > required to be zero. This looks like a reasonable thing to require and
> > is already satisifed by the .dts files in-tree.
> > 
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> 
> This patch itself makes sense, so FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Any proposed extention to the binding requires its own discussion.

Yup.

Marc -- can you queue this please?

Will

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-03 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03 18:00 [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm, gic-v3: require that reserved cells are always 0 Will Deacon
2016-02-03 18:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:20 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-03 18:40   ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160203184017.GA15852@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).