linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:50:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160204135056.GE10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160204134142.GA16315@kvack.org>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:41:42AM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:19:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> > 
> > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:03:39 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > >> Background: new aio code is adding __get_user() calls referencing 64
> > > >> bit quantities (__u64 and __s64).  
> > > >
> > > > There's lots more architectures which do not support 64-bit get_user()
> > > > _or_ __get_user(): avr32, blackfin, metag for example, and m68k which
> > > > has this interesting thing "/* case 8: disabled because gcc-4.1 has a
> > > > broken typeof \" in its *get_user() implementation.  
> > > 
> > > And if you enable it again, you get lots of "warning: cast to pointer from
> > > integer of different size", like you mentioned.
> > 
> > Any thoughts?  I am still using the version of tha aio tree from
> > next-20160111.
> 
> I am still convinced that this is an architecture issue.  Given that 64 bit 
> values work in the *get_user implementations on other architectures, I see 
> no reason there should need to be a workaround for this in common code.

So you're happy to break x86-32 then...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160112164034.0fe945a7@canb.auug.org.au>
     [not found] ` <20160112163835.GD347@kvack.org>
2016-01-27  2:40   ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-29 11:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-29 12:03       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-04  2:19         ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-04 13:41           ` Benjamin LaHaise
2016-02-04 13:50             ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-02-04 14:08               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2016-02-04 14:12                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-04 14:32                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2016-02-04 14:39                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-04 16:01                       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2016-02-04 16:17                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-04 16:27                           ` Benjamin LaHaise
2016-02-04 16:47                           ` Benjamin LaHaise
2016-02-04 18:48                           ` Benjamin LaHaise

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160204135056.GE10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).