From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:26:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/23] arm64: Virtualization Host Extension support
In-Reply-To: <1454522416-6874-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
References: <1454522416-6874-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20160204192641.GJ13974@cbox>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:59:53PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> ARMv8.1 comes with the "Virtualization Host Extension" (VHE for
> short), which enables simpler support of Type-2 hypervisors.
> 
> This extension allows the kernel to directly run at EL2, and
> significantly reduces the number of system registers shared between
> host and guest, reducing the overhead of virtualization.
> 
> In order to have the same kernel binary running on all versions of the
> architecture, this series makes heavy use of runtime code patching.
> 
> The first 22 patches massage the KVM code to deal with VHE and enable
> Linux to run at EL2. The last patch catches an ugly case when VHE
> capable CPUs are paired with some of their less capable siblings. This
> should never happen, but hey...
> 
> I have deliberately left out some of the more "advanced"
> optimizations, as they are likely to distract the reviewer from the
> core infrastructure, which is what I care about at the moment.
> 
> Note: GDB is currently busted on VHE systems, as it checks for version
>       6 on the debug architecture, while VHE is version 7. The
>       binutils people are on the case.
> 
> This has been tested on the FVP_Base_SLV-V8-A model, and based on
> v4.5-rc2. I've put a branch out on:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git kvm-arm64/vhe
> 

You can have my reviewed-by on all patches that I didn't already review
or ack explicitly.

Only exception is the debug stuff where I didn't manage to page in the
context, so hopefully familiar with that code can have a look.

Then this is ready to be queued.

Thanks,
-Christoffer