From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: marvell_cesa fails to register on kirkwood (88F6282)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160205112907.796afb05@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160205090246.GE32272@lunn.ch>
Jan, Andrew
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:02:46 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 06:01:18AM +0100, JM wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am testing marvell_cesa on a kirkwood device (QNAP TS-212p, Marvell
> > Kirkwood 88F6282, dts: http://pastebin.com/Gk95KFHf ).
> > As of kernel 4.4 (4.4.0-trunk-kirkwood #1 Debian 4.4-1~exp1) it fails
> > in the following way:
> >
> > modprobe marvell_cesa allhwsupport=1
> > dmesg | tail -n 1
> > [ 1057.855091] marvell-cesa: probe of f1030000.crypto failed with error -12
> >
> > or:
> >
> > modprobe marvell_cesa
> > dmesg | tail -n 1
> > [ 9178.399357] marvell-cesa: probe of f1030000.crypto failed with error -524
> >
> > With kernel 4.3 it would fail with error -22 on that hardware. There
> > are scattered reports from other users experiencing the same issue
> > (1,2,3)
> >
> > I wonder if this is a result of an invalid definition of the
> > crypto-sram in the dts of this SoC, or perhaps some other problem
> > (PEBKAC included).
>
> Hi Jan
>
> Do you have SRAM enabled in your kernel configuration. The
> mvebu_v5_defconfig does not have it, which is a bug really.
Hm, the CRYPTO_DEV_MARVELL_CESA option selects the SRAM one [1].
Anyway, I also think this error is related to the SRAM (not sure why the
driver is not able to get the SRAM though).
Best Regards,
Boris
[1]http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/crypto/Kconfig#L168
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-05 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-05 5:01 marvell_cesa fails to register on kirkwood (88F6282) JM
2016-02-05 9:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-02-05 10:29 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-02-05 15:00 ` JM
2016-02-05 15:45 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-02-05 16:01 ` JM
2016-02-05 16:09 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-02-05 16:28 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-02-05 20:41 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2016-02-05 21:04 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2016-02-06 15:14 ` JM
2016-02-06 21:57 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2016-02-08 17:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-14 0:09 ` JM
2016-04-05 20:30 ` JM
2016-02-05 22:57 ` JM
2016-02-05 16:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-02-05 17:21 ` JM
2016-02-05 15:58 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-05 16:02 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160205112907.796afb05@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).