From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:35:04 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 01/14] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use clkdev_create() In-Reply-To: <20160210162349.GJ3782@x1> References: <1454982341-22715-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1454982341-22715-2-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20160210162349.GJ3782@x1> Message-ID: <20160210183504.GG30978@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/10, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 08 Feb 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Convert this driver to use clkdev_create() instead of > > clk_register_clkdevs(). The latter API is only used by this driver, > > although this driver only allocates one clk to add anyway. > > Furthermore, this driver allocates the clk_lookup structure with > > devm, but clkdev_drop() will free that structure when passed, > > leading to a double free when this driver is removed. Clean it > > all up and pave the way for the removal of clk_register_clkdevs(). > > > > Cc: Lee Jones > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko > > Cc: Russell King > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > > --- > > drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 26 +++++++++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > I never much liked this code [0] > > Glad for it to be simplified. > > Applied, thanks. > Can you please ack the patch instead? I'd like to take it through the clk tree so that I can remove clk_register_clkdevs() as well. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project