From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com (Robert Richter) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation. In-Reply-To: References: <1454407763-1017-1-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> <1454407763-1017-4-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni > wrote: > > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property > > numa-node-id and device node distance-map. > > How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both > arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you > should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree. > Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well. > > Do you have a git tree with this series? I have pushed it here for you: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10 -Robert