From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mark kernel text segment as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:08:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160215120809.GF13683@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-Y-k_LAbFZJjiPuHq6ssaFCb3WMG_fVGx3ODrvb+hEUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:53:59PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 15 February 2016 at 12:45, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > Ard, I'm about to drop the kernel memory map patches from -next. There
> > are several issues like KASAN (which may as well be a KASAN bug but I
> > haven't got to the bottom of it yet), initrd (you have patches but
> > require additional acks).
> >
> > I'll keep your stuff on the for-next/kernmap branch and do further
> > debugging. If it stabilises in the next 1-2 weeks, I'll merge it into
> > for-next/core for 4.6, otherwise, it will have to wait. I would really
> > like these patches merged but it looks like they need wider testing.
[...]
> If you are going to drop it for now anyway, I can do a v6sub1 with
> this issue and the initrd issue addressed, but also an issue with the
> KVM ksym ref patch with GCC 4.8. Since these issues affect
> bisectability, I'd prefer to rebase entirely, and fold all the fixes
> rather than apply them on top.
That's fine. I'll push one more patch to the for-next/pgtable branch,
converting __set_fixmap_offset() back to a macro as it broke other
architectures. Otherwise it is not rebased and I'll merge it into
for-next core.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 9:28 [PATCH] arm64: mark kernel text segment as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 11:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-15 11:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 11:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 12:08 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2016-02-15 17:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 17:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-16 8:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-16 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-16 10:50 ` James Morse
2016-02-16 10:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-16 11:13 ` James Morse
2016-02-16 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160215120809.GF13683@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).