From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Writes, smp_wmb(), and transitivity?
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:58:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160215175825.GA15878@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello!
Some architectures provide local transitivity for a chain of threads doing
writes separated by smp_wmb(), as exemplified by the litmus tests below.
The pattern is that each thread writes to a its own variable, does an
smp_wmb(), then writes a different value to the next thread's variable.
I don't know of a use of this, but if everyone supports it, it might
be good to mandate it. Status quo is that smp_wmb() is non-transitive,
so it currently isn't supported.
Anyone know of any architectures that do -not- support this?
Assuming all architectures -do- support this, any arguments -against-
officially supporting it in Linux?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two threads:
int a, b;
void thread0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
}
void thread1(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(a, 2);
}
/* After all threads have completed and the dust has settled... */
BUG_ON(a == 1 && b == 1);
Three threads:
int a, b, c;
void thread0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
}
void thread1(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(c, 2);
}
void thread2(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(c, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(a, 2);
}
/* After all threads have completed and the dust has settled... */
BUG_ON(a == 1 && b == 1 && c == 1);
Four threads:
int a, b, c, d;
void thread0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(b, 2);
}
void thread1(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(c, 2);
}
void thread2(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(c, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(d, 2);
}
void thread3(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(d, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(a, 2);
}
/* After all threads have completed and the dust has settled... */
BUG_ON(a == 1 && b == 1 && c == 1 && d == 1);
And so on...
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 17:58 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-02-15 18:58 ` Writes, smp_wmb(), and transitivity? Will Deacon
2016-02-15 20:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-02-16 9:53 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-16 11:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-02-16 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-16 19:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160215175825.GA15878@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).