From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: proc-v7.S: Adjust stack address when XIP_KERNEL
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:32:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160216173225.GE19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602011613360.32766@knanqh.ubzr>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:15:38PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Chris Brandt wrote:
>
> > From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> >
> > When XIP_KERNEL is enabled, the virt to phys address translation for RAM
> > is not the same as the virt to phys address translation for .text.
> > The only way to know where physical RAM is located is to use
> > PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET.
> > The MACRO will be useful for other places where there is a similar problem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>
>
> Looks fine. You may submit it here:
...
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
> > +#define PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP \
> > + ( XIP_VIRT_ADDR(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR) - PAGE_OFFSET + \
> > + PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET - CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR )
> > +#else
> > +#define PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP 0
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > index 0f92d57..1595fb2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ __errata_finish:
> >
> > .align 2
> > __v7_setup_stack_ptr:
> > - .word __v7_setup_stack - .
> > + .word __v7_setup_stack - . + PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP
I keep looking at this patch, and I really find that I detest this
PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP thing - it's really not obvious what's going on
here. It's taken a _long_ time to work this out, which _really_
isn't good going forward.
Let's instead change things to make it much more obvious - see the
patch below.
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
index ebdaaf7dd19f..593e5613184d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
@@ -135,11 +135,18 @@
#define PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET UL(CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET)
#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
-#define PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP \
- ( XIP_VIRT_ADDR(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR) - PAGE_OFFSET + \
- PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET - CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR )
+/*
+ * When referencing data in RAM from the XIP region in a relative manner
+ * with the MMU off, we need the relative offset between the two physical
+ * addresses. The macro below achieves this, which is:
+ * __pa(v_data) - __xip_pa(v_text)
+ */
+#define PHYS_RELATIVE(v_data, v_text) \
+ (((v_data) - PAGE_OFFSET + PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET) - \
+ ((v_text) - XIP_VIRT_ADDR(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR) + \
+ CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR))
#else
-#define PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP 0
+#define PHYS_RELATIVE(v_data, v_text) (v_data) - (v_text)
#endif
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
index 1595fb29ec12..0f8963a7e7d9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ __errata_finish:
.align 2
__v7_setup_stack_ptr:
- .word __v7_setup_stack - . + PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP
+ .word PHYS_RELATIVE(__v7_setup_stack, .)
ENDPROC(__v7_setup)
.bss
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-29 22:11 [PATCH] ARM: proc-v7.S: Adjust stack address when XIP_KERNEL Chris Brandt
2016-01-31 23:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-01 14:08 ` Chris Brandt
2016-02-01 14:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Brandt
2016-02-01 21:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-02-16 17:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-02-16 18:53 ` Chris Brandt
2016-02-16 20:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160216173225.GE19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox