linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: noise issues when recording sound on i.MX28
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:35:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160216193535.GB32169@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BDjkWi+cQK1-J7ag8Z48tY1Uwofi4EkovN-drSC4_reA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Fabio,

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:01:19PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > root at hostname:/sys/kernel/debug/clk find -name saif?_sel
> > ./ref_xtal/pll0/saif0_sel
> > ./ref_xtal/pll0/saif1_sel
> >
> > root at hostname:/sys/kernel/debug/clk cat ./ref_xtal/pll0/saif?_sel/clk_rate
> > 480000000
> > 480000000
> 
> Ok, what about the SAIF0 and SAIF1 sampling rates: are they always the same?

Lothar found a recipe to reproduce. I didn't try, but it's something
along the lines of (Lothar please correct if I'm wrong):

 - start a recording on one SAIF
 - start playback on the other SAIF
 - using direct access to the registers stop and restart the playback
   SAIF via the RUN bit.

The program I have doesn't provide a reliable reproduction recipe, it
runs in a loop and sometimes need several (>1000) iterations to trigger.
In my setup the sampling rates don't change. The values of
BITCLK_MULT_RATE differ however in my setup, I don't see why though.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-27 10:56 noise issues when recording sound on i.MX28 Uwe Kleine-König
2016-01-27 11:53 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-01-27 14:43   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-01-28  6:38     ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-02-02 13:00     ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-10 15:03       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-10 20:10         ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-11  8:40           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-11 14:25             ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-02-16 15:01             ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-16 19:35               ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2016-02-17  7:55               ` Lothar Waßmann
2017-01-10 16:17                 ` Jörg Krause

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160216193535.GB32169@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).