From: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com (Heiko Carstens)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:22:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217082210.GA4175@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160202204156.GA27290@yury-N73SV>
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:41:56PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > However I'll try to write an addon patch to your patch series. Maybe we can
> > still get rid of compat_wrapper.c in a way which makes both of us happy.
> > Also.. the idea with the alias names for compat wrappers does seem to have
> > the disadvantage that it will pollute /proc/kallsyms for example.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm not sure if I will be able to come up with something this week
> > though.
>
> Great, I'm looking forward...
Hi Yuri,
after playing around with this a bit I couldn't come up with a solution
that I'm happy with, unfortunately.
So in order to make some progress here I'd vote that we simply move the
existing compat_wrapper.c from arch/s390 to common code like you did in
your first approach and leave the existing SYSCALL macros alone.
That will have hardly any effect to anybody else and your problem is
solved while s390 still works.
Does that make sense?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 16:57 [PATCH 0/5] all: s390: make compat wrappers the generic solution Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Yury Norov
2016-01-25 18:10 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-28 12:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-01-28 16:31 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-01 11:42 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 7:39 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 15:43 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 16:08 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 19:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 20:41 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-03 8:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-17 8:22 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2016-02-17 13:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] all: declare new wrappers Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] all: s390: redefine wrappers in generic code Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] all: wrap getdents64 syscall Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] all: introduce COMPAT_WRAPPER option and enable it for s390 Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160217082210.GA4175@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).