From: ynorov@caviumnetworks.com (Yury Norov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:57:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217135714.GB13549@yury-N73SV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217082210.GA4175@osiris>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:22:10AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:41:56PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > However I'll try to write an addon patch to your patch series. Maybe we can
> > > still get rid of compat_wrapper.c in a way which makes both of us happy.
> > > Also.. the idea with the alias names for compat wrappers does seem to have
> > > the disadvantage that it will pollute /proc/kallsyms for example.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I'm not sure if I will be able to come up with something this week
> > > though.
> >
> > Great, I'm looking forward...
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> after playing around with this a bit I couldn't come up with a solution
> that I'm happy with, unfortunately.
>
> So in order to make some progress here I'd vote that we simply move the
> existing compat_wrapper.c from arch/s390 to common code like you did in
> your first approach and leave the existing SYSCALL macros alone.
>
> That will have hardly any effect to anybody else and your problem is
> solved while s390 still works.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
OK. This week I'll split v1 as I did with v2, and send it here. So
we'll have two versions, and so will start true elections. :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 16:57 [PATCH 0/5] all: s390: make compat wrappers the generic solution Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Yury Norov
2016-01-25 18:10 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-28 12:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-01-28 16:31 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-01 11:42 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 7:39 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 15:43 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 16:08 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 19:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 20:41 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-03 8:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-17 8:22 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-17 13:57 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] all: declare new wrappers Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] all: s390: redefine wrappers in generic code Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] all: wrap getdents64 syscall Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] all: introduce COMPAT_WRAPPER option and enable it for s390 Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160217135714.GB13549@yury-N73SV \
--to=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox