From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@baylibre.com (Michael Turquette) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:26:56 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 In-Reply-To: <56C44578.5010009@samsung.com> References: <1455603632-11158-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1455603632-11158-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <56C44578.5010009@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20160222182656.2278.68402@quark.deferred.io> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2016-02-17 02:03:36) > On 16/02/16 07:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS > > so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit. > > There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like > > multi_v7 for ARMv7). > > > > Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki > Thanks for the Ack. I've rebased patches #1 and #2 against James's b9e65ebc654d and pushed the clk-samsung branch to the clk tree. I have deleted the clk-samsung-kconfig branch that was blowing up the kbuild robot. clk-samsung will not be rebased and can be used as a dependency for arm-soc. It has been merged into clk-next. Regards, Mike