From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:54:12 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v6] Fix sun7i pin assignment for IRQ's In-Reply-To: <1456161251-2303-1-git-send-email-henry@nitronetworks.nl> References: <1456161251-2303-1-git-send-email-henry@nitronetworks.nl> Message-ID: <20160225005412.GB4736@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, Usually, the patch title should be prefixed by the subsystem it applies to so that maintainer and reviewers can spot it more easily. In this case, it would be something like pinctrl: sunxi: Fix sun7i pin assignment for IRQ's On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:14:07PM +0100, Henry Paulissen wrote: > After testing IRQ pins we found some bugs in the pinctrl declaration. > Both PI* and PC* pins didn't work. PI* pins seemed to be connected > to the wrong mux and PC* pins waren't working at all. > > Please note that the A20 soc manual is contradicting between version > and even within the same document for both the PI and PC pins. Which sections are in contradiction? > Patch is based on testing with the hardware itself. How did you test it? Using the sysfs API, or did you have any hardware connected to it? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: