From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM64: kernel: implement ACPI parking protocol
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:24:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160225092427.GA31728@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CE3C9E.7070505@riken.jp>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:28:30AM +0900, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> Lorenzo,
>
> On Mustang the lockdep warning I reported to you is disappeared and
> the system gets to
> the prompt as you implemented, however only 7 CPUs out of 8 brought up.
It is because, as I mentioned in the other reply to this thread,
the VA should be stashed before setting up the mailboxes, patch below,
that should be final (I tested it on AMD Seattle too), please give it a go.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
-- >8 --
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
index 4b1e5a7..dd671ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
@@ -21,7 +21,14 @@
#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
+struct parking_protocol_mailbox {
+ __le32 cpu_id;
+ __le32 reserved;
+ __le64 entry_point;
+};
+
struct cpu_mailbox_entry {
+ struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox;
phys_addr_t mailbox_addr;
u8 version;
u8 gic_cpu_id;
@@ -59,12 +66,6 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
-struct parking_protocol_mailbox {
- __le32 cpu_id;
- __le32 reserved;
- __le64 entry_point;
-};
-
static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
@@ -97,6 +98,12 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
}
/*
+ * stash the mailbox address mapping to use it for further checks
+ * in postboot method
+ */
+ cpu_entry->mailbox = mailbox;
+
+ /*
* We write the entry point and cpu id as LE regardless of the
* native endianness of the kernel. Therefore, any boot-loaders
* that read this address need to convert this address to the
@@ -107,8 +114,6 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
- iounmap(mailbox);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -116,32 +121,15 @@ static void acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_postboot(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
- struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox;
+ struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox = cpu_entry->mailbox;
__le64 entry_point;
- /*
- * Map mailbox memory with attribute device nGnRE (ie ioremap -
- * this deviates from the parking protocol specifications since
- * the mailboxes are required to be mapped nGnRnE; the attribute
- * discrepancy is harmless insofar as the protocol specification
- * is concerned).
- * If the mailbox is mistakenly allocated in the linear mapping
- * by FW ioremap will fail since the mapping will be prevented
- * by the kernel (it clashes with the linear mapping attributes
- * specifications).
- */
- mailbox = ioremap(cpu_entry->mailbox_addr, sizeof(*mailbox));
- if (!mailbox)
- return;
-
entry_point = readl_relaxed(&mailbox->entry_point);
/*
* Check if firmware has cleared the entry_point as expected
* by the protocol specification.
*/
WARN_ON(entry_point);
-
- iounmap(mailbox);
}
const struct cpu_operations acpi_parking_protocol_ops = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-26 11:10 [PATCH v3] ARM64: kernel: implement ACPI parking protocol Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-26 17:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-27 11:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-26 23:13 ` Loc Ho
2016-01-27 11:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 17:41 ` Loc Ho
2016-02-02 18:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 11:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-03 16:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-24 14:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-24 15:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-24 23:28 ` Itaru Kitayama
2016-02-25 9:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-02-25 20:58 ` Loc Ho
2016-02-26 0:23 ` Itaru Kitayama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160225092427.GA31728@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).