public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (One Thousand Gnomes)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: avoid uninitialized variable use
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:06:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160226000651.628e28fe@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456433283-3761559-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:47:57 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> gcc warns about a potential use of an uninitialized variable in this driver:
> 
> drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c: In function 'ifx_spi_complete':
> drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c:713:6: warning: 'more' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>    if (more || ifx_dev->spi_more || queue_length > 0 ||
> 
> Unlike a lot of other such warnings, this one is correct and describes
> an actual problem in the handling of the "IFX_SPI_HEADER_F" result code.
> 
> This appears to be a result from a restructuring of the driver that
> dates back to before it was merged in the kernel, so it's impossible
> to know where it went wrong. I also don't know what that result code
> means, so I have no idea if setting 'more' to zero is the correct
> solution, but at least it makes the behavior reproducible rather than
> depending on whatever happens to be on the kernel stack.

Would it not be far simpler just to set more = 0 at the top of
ifx_spi_complete ?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-26  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-25 20:47 [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: avoid uninitialized variable use Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-26  0:06 ` One Thousand Gnomes [this message]
2016-02-26 13:54   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160226000651.628e28fe@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --to=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox