From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:38:18 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: dts: add LS1043a-QDS board support In-Reply-To: References: <1450948298-33238-1-git-send-email-Zhiqiang.Hou@freescale.com> <1450948298-33238-2-git-send-email-Zhiqiang.Hou@freescale.com> <20160219032830.GG6756@tiger> Message-ID: <20160228023818.GB22051@tiger> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:10:04AM +0000, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > + pca9547 at 77 { > > > + compatible = "philips,pca9547"; > > > > I cannot find this compatible string in either binding docs or driver code. > > > > See the file below. > ./drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c:115: { "pca9547", pca_9547 }, > Perhaps the vender name should be updated to nxp. Yes, if you look at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.txt, "nxp,pca9547" is the one you should use here. > > > + eeprom at 56 { > > > + compatible = "at24,24c512"; > > > > Unsupported/undocumented compatible? > > Will change it to "atmel, 24c512". Yes, but without the space in the middle. > > > > > > + reg = <0x56>; > > > + }; > > > + > > > + eeprom at 57 { > > > + compatible = "at24,24c512"; > > > + reg = <0x57>; > > > + }; > > > + > > > + adt7461a at 4c { > > > > temp-sensor should be a better node name, if I understand the device correctly. > > > > I didn't find a reference in kernel, so what name should be better, do you have any advice? "temp-sensor" is what I see from the example in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/lm90.txt. Shawn