From: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com (Kirill A. Shutemov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: mm: Fix definition of pmd_mknotpresent
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:11:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302151152.GA94701@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456880580-22311-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@arm.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:03:00AM +0000, Steve Capper wrote:
> Currently pmd_mknotpresent will use a zero entry to respresent an
> invalidated pmd.
>
> Unfortunately this definition clashes with pmd_none, thus it is
> possible for a race condition to occur if zap_pmd_range sees pmd_none
> whilst __split_huge_pmd_locked is running too with pmdp_invalidate
> just called.
>
> This patch fixes the race condition by modifying pmd_mknotpresent to
> create non-zero faulting entries (as is done in other architectures),
> removing the ambiguity with pmd_none.
>
> Fixes: 8d9625070073 ("ARM: mm: Transparent huge page support for LPAE systems.")
> Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> ---
>
> This patch addresses an issue discussed at:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1602.3/01846.html
>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> index dc46398..451b6e7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> @@ -249,10 +249,10 @@ PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkyoung, |= PMD_SECT_AF);
> #define pfn_pmd(pfn,prot) (__pmd(((phys_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot)))
> #define mk_pmd(page,prot) pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page),prot)
>
> -/* represent a notpresent pmd by zero, this is used by pmdp_invalidate */
> +/* represent a notpresent pmd by faulting entry, this is used by pmdp_invalidate */
> static inline pmd_t pmd_mknotpresent(pmd_t pmd)
> {
> - return __pmd(0);
> + return __pmd(pmd_val(pmd) & ~PMD_TYPE_MASK);
I'm confused. Wouldn't it still be present?
arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h:#define pmd_present(pmd) (pmd_val(pmd))
Shouldn't pmd_present() be re-defined as (pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) or
something?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-02 1:03 [PATCH] arm: mm: Fix definition of pmd_mknotpresent Steve Capper
2016-03-02 15:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2016-03-02 15:55 ` Will Deacon
2016-03-02 18:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302151152.GA94701@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).