From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:13:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] fix memremap on ARM In-Reply-To: References: <1456508053-15015-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20160303171347.GY19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:24:41PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > If there are no remaining objections, may I suggest that Dan takes > patch #1 and #2, and that I put the third patch into Russell's patch > system? The only strict ordering requirement is that #1 is merged > before #2 and #3 both hit mainline, and that is solved by taking #1 > and #2 in order. How does the dependency between 1 and 3 get satisfied? Your comment makes no sense to me. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.