From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: simplify and optimize kernel mapping
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 01:40:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160307014031.GA2158@svinekod> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457010581-4924-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Hi,
I like this series, though I have a few minor comments below.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:09:38PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This series makes a couple of minor changes that should result in the
> kernel being mapped in a more efficient manner.
>
> First of all, it merges the .head.text with the .text section (patch #2)
> after moving everything except the kernel and EFI header into the __init
> section (patch #1)
Face-to-face, you suggested it might be possible to move .init before .text, so
we could place the EFI header in there too (and keep .text aligned while making
it smaller). Is there some reason we missed that means we cannot do this?
> Then, it standardizes the segment alignment to 64 KB for all page sizes.
> (patch #3). In the example below (4 KB granule, with Jeremy's PTE_CONT
> patch applied), we lose 80 KB in total to padding, but the resulting
> mappings do look somewhat better.
I suspect some people might want a minimal alignment option for tinification
purposes, but this sounds fine to me as a default. I also think we can wait
until someone asks.
As a general think, currently we use "chunk" instead of "segment" in the mm
code. We only used "chunk" so as to not overload "section". For consistency it
would be nice to either keep with "chunk" or convert existing uses to
"segment". I much prefer the latter!
> Before:
>
> 0xffff000008082000-0xffff000008090000 56K ro x SHD AF UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008090000-0xffff000008200000 1472K ro x SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008200000-0xffff000008600000 4M ro x SHD AF BLK UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008600000-0xffff000008660000 384K ro x SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008660000-0xffff00000866c000 48K ro x SHD AF UXN MEM
> 0xffff00000866c000-0xffff000008670000 16K ro NX SHD AF UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008670000-0xffff000008900000 2624K ro NX SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008900000-0xffff000008909000 36K ro NX SHD AF UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008c39000-0xffff000008c40000 28K RW NX SHD AF UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008c40000-0xffff000008d50000 1088K RW NX SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008d50000-0xffff000008d57000 28K RW NX SHD AF UXN MEM
>
> After:
>
> 0xffff000008080000-0xffff000008200000 1536K ro x SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008200000-0xffff000008600000 4M ro x SHD AF BLK UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008600000-0xffff000008670000 448K ro x SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008670000-0xffff000008910000 2688K ro NX SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008c50000-0xffff000008d60000 1088K RW NX SHD AF CON UXN MEM
> 0xffff000008d60000-0xffff000008d6b000 44K RW NX SHD AF UXN MEM
>
> I am aware that this clashes with Jeremy's patch to allow CONT_SIZE alignment
> when CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA=y, but the net effect of patch #3 is the same
> (only the Kconfig change is not included here)
Jeremy, do you have any thoughts on this series?
Thanks,
Mark.
> Ard Biesheuvel (3):
> arm64: move early boot code to the .init segment
> arm64: cover the .head.text section in the .text segment mapping
> arm64: simplify kernel segment mapping granularity
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 32 +++++++++-----------
> arch/arm64/kernel/image.h | 4 +++
> arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 26 +++++++++-------
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 10 +++---
> 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-07 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-03 13:09 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: simplify and optimize kernel mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-03 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: move early boot code to the .init segment Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-03 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: cover the .head.text section in the .text segment mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-03 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: simplify kernel segment mapping granularity Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-07 1:40 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-03-08 0:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: simplify and optimize kernel mapping Jeremy Linton
2016-03-09 5:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160307014031.GA2158@svinekod \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).