[PATCH] mtd: only use __xipram annotation when XIP_KERNEL is set

[tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)]

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [160304 16:34]:
> On Friday 04 March 2016 16:22:03 Brian Norris wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:19:21AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 04 March 2016 16:02:25 Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:41:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > When XIP_KERNEL is enabled, some functions are defined in the .data
> > > > > ELF section because we require them to be in RAM whenever we communicate
> > > > > with the flash chip. However this causes problems when FTRACE is
> > > > > enabled and gcc emits calls to __gnu_mcount_nc in the function
> > > > > prolog:
> > > > > 
> > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_chip_setup':
> > > > > :(.data+0x272fc): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_probe_chip':
> > > > > :(.data+0x27de8): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s:70: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_probe.o] Error 1
> > > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s:421: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.o] Error 1
> > > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s:1895: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > 
> > > > Can you provide a sample .config that DOES build correctly with
> > > > XIP_KERNEL enabled + this patch? My first attempt yields some other
> > > > failures I don't care to fixup right now...
> > > > 
> > > > Anyway, I don't doubt you have a good fix here, so I can probably take
> > > > it. Any review from others would be welcome though.
> > > 
> > > I found the config in the attachment in my logs.
> > 
> > Thanks...
> > 
> > > To get this config working, I also needed this hunk from my set of
> > > old unsubmitted patches:
> > 
> > ...but, does anyone care about XIP / MTD_XIP then, if the first two
> > examples we have both have long-standing build issues?
> > 
> 
> Probably not. I just checked the third user (omap1), and it seems that one
> has been broken since 2009 with 941132606c76 ("OMAP: Remove OMAP_IO_ADDRESS,
> use OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS and OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS instead"), when Tony replaced
> the inline omap_readl() with an extern function, thus breaking the
> implementation of xip_irqpending() that must be inlined.
> 
> The other two have apparently been broken since 2011, by other patches
> that also broke compilation.

For omaps, I don't recall anybody working on xip for probably close to
10 years.

Regards,

Tony