From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: pl330: Fix some race conditions in residue calculation
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:42:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308041238.GL11154@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456319674.2867.15.camel@linaro.org>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:14:34PM +0000, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> The residue calculation in pl330_tx_status doesn't handle transitional
> states that occur at the time one descriptor (A) is completed and the
> next (B) is started. Specifically, both A and B can simultaneously be in
> the BUSY state and at this time the thread's 'req_running' may (or may
> not) be -1.
you are under lock so descriptor state wont be update while we are it.
Also the query for residue is for "a descriptor" not whatever is the current
running descriptor...
>
> To cope with this situation we change the code to ensure A is treated as
> complete and B as having not yet started. Prior to the change, the code
> would calculate a transferred byte count as if both A and B had
> completed.
You query for either A or B not both!
>
> Fixes: aee4d1fac887 ("dmaengine: pl330: improve pl330_tx_status() function")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> I discovered this issue when trying to work out why audio stopped
> working on ARM's Juno platform and bisected it to commit aee4d1fac887.
> Whilst this patch seems to fix the problems I was seeing, I can't help
> but think there are more race conditions with this code. E.g. if the
> running descriptor changes under us, pl330_get_current_xferred_count
> can end up reading values from hardware that relate to a different
> descriptor. And if we're really unlucky, the reading of the 'val' and
> 'addr' values in pl330_get_current_xferred_count can come from different
> descriptors. I don't know if there is any locks we can use to prevent
> such races or if we need to try and detect when things have changed and
> redo/abort the residue calculation...
>
> drivers/dma/pl330.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> index 17ee758..55e3c5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> @@ -2240,6 +2240,7 @@ pl330_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_cookie_t cookie,
> struct dma_pl330_desc *desc, *running = NULL;
> struct dma_pl330_chan *pch = to_pchan(chan);
> unsigned int transferred, residual = 0;
> + bool first_busy;
>
> ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
>
> @@ -2253,16 +2254,31 @@ pl330_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_cookie_t cookie,
>
> if (pch->thread->req_running != -1)
> running = pch->thread->req[pch->thread->req_running].desc;
> + first_busy = true;
>
> /* Check in pending list */
> list_for_each_entry(desc, &pch->work_list, node) {
> if (desc->status == DONE)
> transferred = desc->bytes_requested;
> - else if (running && desc == running)
> - transferred =
> - pl330_get_current_xferred_count(pch, desc);
> - else
> + else if (desc->status == BUSY && first_busy) {
> + first_busy = false;
> + if (running && desc == running) {
> + transferred =
> + pl330_get_current_xferred_count(pch, desc);
> + } else {
> + /* BUSY but not running means it's just completed */
> + transferred = desc->bytes_requested;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Descriptor is either in PREP state queued for future
> + * transfer or it is the second BUSY descriptor we have
> + * seen. The latter case means it has just, or is about
> + * to be, started, so treat it as having not yet
> + * transferred any bytes, the same as PREP.
> + */
> transferred = 0;
> + }
> residual += desc->bytes_requested - transferred;
> if (desc->txd.cookie == cookie) {
> switch (desc->status) {
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-24 13:14 [PATCH] dmaengine: pl330: Fix some race conditions in residue calculation Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-03-08 4:12 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2016-03-08 10:40 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-03-08 14:15 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08 15:50 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-03-11 7:43 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-15 9:10 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160308041238.GL11154@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).