From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle configuration to DMA users
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:51:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308075131.GE8418@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308025547.GI11154@localhost>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:25:47AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:30:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:08:57PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > Hi Vinod,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:24:29 +0530
> > > Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:59:31AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > > +/* Dedicated DMA parameter register layout */
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_DST_DATA_BLK_SIZE(n) (((n) - 1) << 24)
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_DST_WAIT_CYCLES(n) (((n) - 1) << 16)
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_SRC_DATA_BLK_SIZE(n) (((n) - 1) << 8)
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_SRC_WAIT_CYCLES(n) (((n) - 1) << 0)
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * struct sun4i_dma_chan_config - DMA channel config
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * @para: contains information about block size and time before checking
> > > > > + * DRQ line. This is device specific and only applicable to dedicated
> > > > > + * DMA channels
> > > >
> > > > What information, can you elobrate.. And why can't you use existing
> > > > dma_slave_config for this?
> > >
> > > Block size is related to the device FIFO size. I guess it allows the
> > > DMA channel to launch a transfer of X bytes without having to check the
> > > DRQ line (the line telling the DMA engine it can transfer more data
> > > to/from the device). The wait cycles information is apparently related
> > > to the number of clks the engine should wait before polling/checking
> > > the DRQ line status between each block transfer. I'm not sure what it
> > > saves to put WAIT_CYCLES() to something != 1, but in their BSP,
> > > Allwinner tweak that depending on the device.
>
> we already have block size aka src/dst_maxburst, why not use that one.
I'm not sure it's really the same thing. The DMA controller also has a
burst parameter, that is either 1 byte or 8 bytes, and ends up being
different from this one.
> Why does dmaengine need to wait? Can you explain that
We have no idea, we thought you might have one :)
It doesn't really makes sense to us, but it does have a significant
impact on the throughput.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160308/9d09487f/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-07 9:59 [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle configuration to DMA users Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 14:54 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-07 15:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 20:30 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-08 2:55 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08 2:59 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08 7:51 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2016-03-08 8:42 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2016-03-08 10:05 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 10:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-08 8:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-08 9:10 ` [linux-sunxi] " Priit Laes
2016-03-08 10:04 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 10:08 ` [linux-sunxi] " LABBE Corentin
2016-03-08 9:59 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 10:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 6:24 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 9:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 10:06 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 10:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 11:21 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 11:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 6:26 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 9:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 10:09 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 10:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-11 11:18 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-14 11:46 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-16 3:22 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-07 15:30 ` [linux-sunxi] " Priit Laes
2016-03-07 15:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 17:15 ` Emilio López
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160308075131.GE8418@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox