From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: Fix of_clk_get() call in a non sleeping context
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:55:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308205503.GO19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308175147.7203734e@free-electrons.com>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:51:47PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:38:11 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
> > And from clk_enable comment we have:
> > ""
> > clk_enable must not sleep, which differentiates it from clk_prepare. In a
> > simple case, clk_enable can be used instead of clk_prepare to ungate a clk
> > if the operation will never sleep.
> > ""
> >
> > Moreoever for me the "must" was to insist to the order of the call no to
> > the fact that both must be called.
>
> Right make sense, thanks for correcting me on this. If that's OK from a
> clock maintainer point of view, I'm fine.
The comment Gregory quoted is an _implementation_ comment: it's saying
that you can implement the gating/ungating in either clk_prepare() or
clk_enable().
It isn't giving permission for users of the clk API to omit these calls.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 14:18 [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: Fix of_clk_get() call in a non sleeping context Gregory CLEMENT
2016-03-08 15:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-08 16:19 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-03-08 16:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-08 16:38 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-03-08 16:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-08 20:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-03-08 20:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-03-10 12:44 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160308205503.GO19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).