From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: fix overlap of Crypto SRAM with PCIe memory window
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:11:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160311181122.GA12577@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bn6m3309.fsf@free-electrons.com>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:56:38PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On mar., mars 08 2016, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > When the Crypto SRAM mappings were added to the Device Tree files
> > describing the Armada XP boards in commit c466d997bb16 ("ARM: mvebu:
> > define crypto SRAM ranges for all armada-xp boards"), the fact that
> > those mappings were overlaping with the PCIe memory aperture was
> > overlooked. Due to this, we currently have for all Armada XP platforms
> > a situation that looks like this:
> >
> > Memory mapping on Armada XP boards with internal registers at
> > 0xf1000000:
> >
> > - 0x00000000 -> 0xf0000000 3.75G RAM
> > - 0xf0000000 -> 0xf1000000 16M NOR flashes (AXP GP / AXP DB)
> > - 0xf1000000 -> 0xf1100000 1M internal registers
> > - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000 126M PCIe memory aperture
> > - 0xf8100000 -> 0xf8110000 64KB Crypto SRAM #0 => OVERLAPS WITH PCIE !
> > - 0xf8110000 -> 0xf8120000 64KB Crypto SRAM #1 => OVERLAPS WITH PCIE !
> > - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000 1M PCIe I/O aperture
> > - 0xfff0000 -> 0xffffffff 1M BootROM
> >
> > The overlap means that when PCIe devices are added, depending on their
> > memory window needs, they might or might not be mapped into the
> > physical address space. Indeed, they will not be mapped if the area
> > allocated in the PCIe memory aperture by the PCI core overlaps with
> > one of the Crypto SRAM. Typically, a Intel IGB PCIe NIC that needs 8MB
> > of PCIe memory will see its PCIe memory window allocated from
> > 0xf80000000 for 8MB, which overlaps with the Crypto SRAM windows. Due
> > to this, the PCIe window is not created, and any attempt to access the
> > PCIe window makes the kernel explode:
> >
> > [ 3.302213] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation.
> > [ 3.307841] pci 0000:00:09.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0143)
> > [ 3.313539] mvebu_mbus: cannot add window '4:f8', conflicts with another window
> > [ 3.320870] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie-controller: Could not create MBus window at [mem 0xf8000000-0xf87fffff]: -22
> > [ 3.330811] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xf08c0018
> >
> > This problem does not occur on Armada 370 boards, because we use the
> > following memory mapping (for boards that have internal registers at
> > 0xf1000000):
> >
> > - 0x00000000 -> 0xf0000000 3.75G RAM
> > - 0xf0000000 -> 0xf1000000 16M NOR flashes (AXP GP / AXP DB)
> > - 0xf1000000 -> 0xf1100000 1M internal registers
> > - 0xf1100000 -> 0xf1110000 64KB Crypto SRAM #0 => OK !
> > - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000 126M PCIe memory
> > - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000 1M PCIe I/O
> > - 0xfff0000 -> 0xffffffff 1M BootROM
> >
> > Obviously, the solution is to align the location of the Crypto SRAM
> > mappings of Armada XP to be similar with the ones on Armada 370, i.e
> > have them between the "internal registers" area and the beginning of
> > the PCIe aperture.
> >
> > However, we have a special case with the OpenBlocks AX3-4 platform,
> > which has a 128 MB NOR flash. Currently, this NOR flash is mapped from
> > 0xf0000000 to 0xf8000000. This is possible because on OpenBlocks
> > AX3-4, the internal registers are not at 0xf1000000. And this explains
> > why the Crypto SRAM mappings were not configured at the same place on
> > Armada XP.
> >
> > Hence, the solution is two-fold:
> >
> > (1) Move the NOR flash mapping on Armada XP OpenBlocks AX3-4 from
> > 0xe8000000 to 0xf0000000. This frees the 0xf0000000 ->
> > 0xf80000000 space.
> >
> > (2) Move the Crypto SRAM mappings on Armada XP to be similar to
> > Armada 370 (except of course that Armada XP has two Crypto SRAM
> > and not one).
> >
> > After this patch, the memory mapping on Armada XP boards with
> > registers at 0xf1 is:
> >
> > - 0x00000000 -> 0xf0000000 3.75G RAM
> > - 0xf0000000 -> 0xf1000000 16M NOR flashes (AXP GP / AXP DB)
> > - 0xf1000000 -> 0xf1100000 1M internal registers
> > - 0xf1100000 -> 0xf1110000 64KB Crypto SRAM #0
> > - 0xf1110000 -> 0xf1120000 64KB Crypto SRAM #1
> > - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000 126M PCIe memory
> > - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000 1M PCIe I/O
> > - 0xfff0000 -> 0xffffffff 1M BootROM
> >
> > And the memory mapping for the special case of the OpenBlocks AX3-4
> > (internal registers at 0xd0000000, NOR of 128 MB):
> >
> > - 0x00000000 -> 0xc0000000 3G RAM
> > - 0xd0000000 -> 0xd1000000 1M internal registers
> > - 0xe800000 -> 0xf0000000 128M NOR flash
> > - 0xf1100000 -> 0xf1110000 64KB Crypto SRAM #0
> > - 0xf1110000 -> 0xf1120000 64KB Crypto SRAM #1
> > - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000 126M PCIe memory
> > - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000 1M PCIe I/O
> > - 0xfff0000 -> 0xffffffff 1M BootROM
> >
> > Fixes: c466d997bb16 ("ARM: mvebu: define crypto SRAM ranges for all armada-xp boards")
> > Reported-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
>
> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
>
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> it would be nice having this fix applied on v4.5-rc. Could you applied
> this patch directly, or do you want pull request for it?
Applied to fixes. Are you 150% sure you don't need some bake time on this patch
to avoid surprises?
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-11 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 15:59 [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: fix overlap of Crypto SRAM with PCIe memory window Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-10 12:56 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-03-11 18:11 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2016-03-11 6:58 ` Phil Sutter
2016-03-11 9:36 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160311181122.GA12577@localhost \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).