From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] bus: imx-weim: Take the 'status' property value into account
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 17:08:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160313010849.GI17502@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160229033649.GS22051@tiger>
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:36:49AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:01:53AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
> >
> > Currently we have an incorrect behaviour when multiple devices
> > are present under the weim node. For example:
> >
> > &weim {
> > ...
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > sram at 0,0 {
> > ...
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > mram at 0,0 {
> > ...
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > };
> >
> > In this case only the 'sram' device should be probed and not 'mram'.
> >
> > However what happens currently is that the status variable is ignored,
> > causing the 'sram' device to be disabled and 'mram' to be enabled.
> >
> > Change the weim_parse_dt() function to use
> > for_each_available_child_of_node()so that the devices marked with
> > 'status = disabled' are not probed.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Wolfgang Netbal <wolfgang.netbal@sigmatek.at>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
>
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
>
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> I do not have any other 'driver' patches queued, so please help directly
> apply this one. Considering this fixes a real problem, it would be good
> if we can merge this through -rc. But we understand that it's -rc6 now,
> and this doesn't fix a regression or so-critical issue, so it should be
> fine to queue the patch for the next release as well.
Sorry for the high latency here, I had missed this patch and noticed now when
I did a sweep. I've merged it into next/drivers for 4.6.
-Olof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-13 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 12:01 [PATCH] bus: imx-weim: Take the 'status' property value into account Fabio Estevam
2016-02-23 8:57 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-02-29 3:36 ` Shawn Guo
2016-03-13 1:08 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160313010849.GI17502@localhost \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).