linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: SROM driver for v4.6, 2nd try
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 17:16:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160313011604.GL17502@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2210448.V5gsMerLz6@wuerfel>

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:11:32PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2016 09:04:54 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 01.03.2016 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > After Olof comments, second pull request with movement of SROM code
> > > to separate driver - under drivers/memory/samsung (more are planned for
> > > that directory).
> > > 
> > > This depends on (included here):
> > > 1. tag samsung-dt-srom-4.6: SROM-DT changes, merged already to arm-soc,
> > > 2. tag samsung-soc-4.6-2: next/soc changes, sent few days ago, not merged yet.
> > > 
> > > This may conflict in the future (in linux-next or Linus) around
> > > drivers/memory/Kconfig with iommu tree. Just add all the changes.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The diff at the end contains both samsung-soc-4.6-2 and this stuff.
> > > To make finding changes easier, below you will find difference between
> > > this tag and samsung-soc-4.6-2:
> > 
> > I see you did not pull this yet so can you wait a little bit? Rob
> > Herring posted some comments on bindings so this might be revisited...
> > 
> > This is an unlucky patchset...
> 
> It was a bit late last night, and I didn't want to check that the
> dependencies were correct. I also saw that you had discussed these
> contents with Olof before, but didn't follow the thread there, so
> I was hoping that Olof could get back to it and check that his
> concerns are all addressed before picking it up.

Hi,

I've merged the other SoC branches now (that were respun without this SROM
contents). I think it's safe given the feedback from Rob to wait with this
driver for the next cycle. That way the dependencies are gone too since they
will have been merged.


-Olof

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-13  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01  9:37 [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: dts for 4.6, 2nd pull Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-01  9:37 ` [GIT PULL] ARM64: EXYNOS: defconfig for 4.6 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-02 22:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01  9:37 ` [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: SROM driver for v4.6, 2nd try Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-03  0:04   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-03 13:11     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-13  1:16       ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2016-03-02 20:17 ` [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: dts for 4.6, 2nd pull Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160313011604.GL17502@localhost \
    --to=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).