public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER to define props
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:48:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160315234830.GB29178@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458077493-350816-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-6.0 notices that the use of the property_entry in this file that
> was recently introduced cannot work right, as we initialize the wrong
> field:
> 
> raumfeld.c:387:3: error: the address of 'raumfeld_rotary_encoder_steps' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Werror=address]
>    DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_steps, },
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> raumfeld.c:389:3: error: the address of 'raumfeld_rotary_encoder_axis' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Werror=address]
>    DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_axis, },
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> raumfeld.c:391:3: error: the address of 'raumfeld_rotary_encoder_relative_axis' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Werror=address]
>    DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_relative_axis, },
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> The problem appears to stem from relying on an old definition of
> 'struct property', but it has changed several times since the code
> could have last been correct.
> 
> This changes the code to use the PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER() macro instead,
> which works fine for the current definition and is a safer way of doing
> the initialization.

Ah, very nice, I hated how the original style of specifying properties
worked. I'll have to pull 4.5 into my branch first to get it though...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: a9e340dce3c3 ("Input: rotary_encoder - move away from platform data structure")
> ---
> 
> The broken patch is currently in the input-next tree, please apply this
> fixup on top.

Applied, thank you.

> 
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c | 15 ++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> index 16ffd01daff1..5a941bd3dbed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> @@ -378,18 +378,11 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table raumfeld_rotary_gpios_table = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -static u32 raumfeld_rotary_encoder_steps = 24;
> -static u32 raumfeld_rotary_encoder_axis = REL_X;
> -static u32 raumfeld_rotary_encoder_relative_axis = 1;
> -
>  static struct property_entry raumfeld_rotary_properties[] = {
> -	{ "rotary-encoder,steps-per-period",
> -		DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_steps, },
> -	{ "linux,axis",
> -		DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_axis, },
> -	{ "rotary-encoder,relative_axis",
> -		DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_relative_axis, },
> -	{ NULL }
> +	PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("rotary-encoder,steps-per-period", u32, 24),
> +	PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("linux,axis",			  u32, REL_X),
> +	PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("rotary-encoder,relative_axis",	  u32, 1),
> +	{ },
>  };
>  
>  static struct property_set raumfeld_rotary_property_set = {
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 

-- 
Dmitry

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-15 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-15 21:31 [PATCH] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER to define props Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-15 23:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160315234830.GB29178@dtor-ws \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox