From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:44:40 +0100 Subject: [RESEND PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities In-Reply-To: <004901d1837a$2df9f620$89ede260$@codeaurora.org> References: <1456142895-32646-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <20160224101949.GB1391@katana> <004901d1837a$2df9f620$89ede260$@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20160321164440.GA1505@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > enabled. I have patch like below to fix it, but wanted to ask you if it > would correct to have this in the > original patch or should I sent a separate fix ? Sorry for the mess on this. Once a patch is applied, it is in linux-next, so you need to send incremental patches to fix things. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: