From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:47:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection In-Reply-To: <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> References: <1458285681-25684-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net> <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit : > > On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : > >> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device > >> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed > >> through a new device called chipid. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > >> [nicolas.ferre at atmel.com: remove useless warnings] > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++ > >> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++----- > > We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc > branches: what do you think Alexandre? > I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in line with the code. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com