From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:02:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix invalid maximum voltage for buck9 supplying SD card In-Reply-To: References: <1458807125-13580-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160324095332.GS2566@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20160324110206.GT2566@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:25:35PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Why does this regulator even have voltage constraints configured? Is > > there any intention that it should ever be varied at runtime? > Good question. I was also wondering that, if tetting it by 5 mV lower > causes failure, then the constraints are actually fixed at 3.755 V. I > do not know the answer. Boards schematics do not specify the > requirement here, datasheet for PMIC says default value of 3.4V. Heh, For some reason people seem to frequently want to put the maximum voltage range for the regulator into the constraints even though that is almost certainly broken and generally nonsensical. > maybe the regulator driver is missing proper starting value for 'vsel' > (datasheet says values in register start from 0x40 -> 3 V). Something > looks wrong here... It's possible it's just broken and has never been tested. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available URL: