From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:03:40 +0200 Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/3] sunxi: A20-OLinuXino-LIME2: Fix ldo3/ldo4 in DTS In-Reply-To: <56F92B27.5050009@redhat.com> References: <1458932647-24268-1-git-send-email-haas@computerlinguist.org> <56F5DEB9.7070207@gmail.com> <56F64ED5.7030405@gmail.com> <56F794E1.4080108@computerlinguist.org> <56F92B27.5050009@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20160329120340.GM30977@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:01:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >but unless there's a real need > >for me to verify this, > >I'll simply revert the u-boot patch and enjoy working GPIO. > > Given the entire discussion in this thread, I agree that fixing this in u-boot > is best. But I do not see reverting the u-boot patch disabling ldo3/4 by default > as the solution. ldo3/4 are unused on most boards, so disabling them by default > clearly is the right thing todo IMHO. > > Instead please submit a patch for configs/A20-OLinuXino-Lime2_defconfig which > configures them at 2800 mV there (per the Lime2 schematic). > > It would be good to also check the Lime1 schematic if they are used in the same > way there, I would also welcome a patch for: > > configs/A10-OLinuXino-Lime_defconfig > configs/A20-OLinuXino-Lime_defconfig Adding a comment to the DT summing up that whole discussion would be great too. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: