From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 00:16:56 -0500
Subject: dtc warnings
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomijKf3m07Lc3+fWawxAPwe83F8k9akz1LOTokpZNL2ig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL_Jsq+=OjY8y_8x7OSm-MWYKbrHN5cbv4TLwULxhNq+gfiMtw@mail.gmail.com>
 <56FE27F9.2070100@gmail.com>
 <CAJKOXPdDyVbfSyshu4j21Ax2J-VwPpMZgAGEeO8VtgFYh4hTmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <56FE7E4A.2000601@ti.com> <20160403065909.GF2987@vireshk-i7>
 <20160403080854.GA12133@kozik-lap>
 <CAKohpomijKf3m07Lc3+fWawxAPwe83F8k9akz1LOTokpZNL2ig@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160404051656.GV17806@rob-hp-laptop>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 05:57:00PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 April 2016 at 13:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Warnings coming from recent linux-next:
> >
> >   DTC     arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dtb
> > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp at 1800000000 has a unit name, but no reg property
> > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp at 1700000000 has a unit name, but no reg property
> 
> @Rob: What should we be doing about these warnings?
> OPP-entries don't have a reg property obviously and we
> discussed earlier if naming them based on freq is fine or
> not.

We can whitelist opp nodes in dtc, use oppN instead, or ignore the 
warnings for now. 

Rob