From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:17:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module In-Reply-To: <20160408035445.GA9532@kozik-lap> References: <1459756459-22061-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160407132947.GB3323@x1> <20160408035445.GA9532@kozik-lap> Message-ID: <20160408071721.GE3323@x1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 08 Apr 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Apr 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > The consumer of max77693 regulators on Trats2 board (samsung-usb2-phy > > > driver) supports deferred probing so the max77693 main MFD driver can be > > > built now as a module. This gives more flexibility and removes manual > > > ordering of init calls. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Paul Gortmaker > > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > > drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 14 ++------------ > > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > I assume this can be taken immediately and doesn't depend on anything > > external to the set? > > > > For my own reference: > > Acked-by: Lee Jones > > Hi, > > Yes, this can be taken as is. Only second patch (changing defconfig) > depends on this. I can take the second patch through samsung tree but > that would require a tag/branch with this... which looks like an > overkill. So maybe you would take both? If I take the defconfig patch without a tag, there will almost certainly be merge conflicts. Other solutions include; delaying the defconfig patch for one cycle or trying to get it in post -rc1. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog