From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: Fix imprecise external abort for off mode on 36xx
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:01:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412000151.GK5995@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570C3040.3030001@ti.com>
* Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> [160411 16:17]:
> On 04/11/2016 04:13 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> We still need the call to omap3_intc_resume_idle because the intc restore
> >> context only gets called on resume from off mode. Perhaps we only need to
> >> call omap3_intc_resume_idle when coming back from non-off modes, otherwise
> >> let the context restore handle the reconfig of the INTC idle/sysconfig
> >> registers?
> >
> > OK. Did you actually test by commenting out omap3_intc_resume_idle()?
> >
> > Yeah sounds like we can optimize out the restore there for non-off
> > modes.
>
> Yes I removed it entirely for testing, and I also tried something like this for
> a possible workable solution (without your patch applied):
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index fcf975eb5e9d..8d39b44ba3a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -268,7 +268,6 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
> int per_next_state = PWRDM_POWER_ON;
> int core_next_state = PWRDM_POWER_ON;
> int per_going_off;
> - int core_prev_state;
> u32 sdrc_pwr = 0;
>
> mpu_next_state = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm);
> @@ -348,17 +347,16 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
> sdrc_write_reg(sdrc_pwr, SDRC_POWER);
>
> /* CORE */
> - if (core_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
> - core_prev_state = pwrdm_read_prev_pwrst(core_pwrdm);
> - if (core_prev_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> + if (core_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON &&
> + pwrdm_read_prev_pwrst(core_pwrdm) == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> omap3_core_restore_context();
> omap3_cm_restore_context();
> omap3_push_sram_idle();
> omap3_push_sram_secure_idle();
> omap2_sms_restore_context();
> - }
> - }
> - omap3_intc_resume_idle();
> + } else
> + omap3_intc_resume_idle();
> +
>
> pwrdm_post_transition(NULL);
>
>
OK yeah that works for me.
Can you post a proper patch with few minor changes:
- Add a comment to the code somewhere saying that for off mode,
omap3_core_restore_context() also restores intc and we don't
need to omap3_intc_resume_idle().
- Add the brackets to the one line else statement for checkpatch.
Cheers,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 21:35 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: Fix imprecise external abort for off mode on 36xx Tony Lindgren
2016-04-07 20:17 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-04-07 23:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-11 18:20 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-04-11 21:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-11 23:16 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-04-12 0:01 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-04-13 15:45 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-04-13 15:50 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160412000151.GK5995@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).