From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:51:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / ARM64: Remove EXPERT dependency for ACPI on ARM64
In-Reply-To: <20160413052553.GF14664@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1459360718-24125-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org>
 <20160412172315.GH8066@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20160413052553.GF14664@sirena.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20160413085139.GA15182@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 06:25:53AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:23:15PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > I'm fine with dropping the EXPERT dependency (of course, not a cc
> > stable). While arm64 ACPI is not "done" yet (nor is DT; there are
> > important ongoing developments like PCIe, IORT), I think the core arm64
> > ACPI support passed the EXPERT stage. I also don't think a default y
> > would imply any maintainer endorsement; vendors targeting ACPI are
> > already doing this for various reasons (distro requirement, certain ACPI
> 
> So you're OK with the current patch?

Yes, I posted an ack in the previous reply (with a note that Will and
the arm-soc maintainers still have a right to veto this change).

-- 
Catalin