From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:31:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler In-Reply-To: <570F9942.30608@roeck-us.net> References: <1460120039-2497-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1460120039-2497-4-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20160413110519.GE32018@leverpostej> <570E4550.5000207@roeck-us.net> <20160414004223.GA18564@roeck-us.net> <20160414085242.GB1533@katana> <570F9942.30608@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <20160414143125.GB1539@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > "the higher, the more important" makes sense to me. We don't have to > enforce the linux scheme, though that happens to be the same (the priority > argument in the notifier block takes an int, so it would not even be > necessary to adjust it unless someone specifies 0xffffffff). I think we should enforce the scheme internally (but not in DT, of course): a) it is documented to be in the range 0-255 b) it should be valid to prioritize the watchdogs with 1,2,3 in DT. If we don't apply the '255 - pos_in_sorted_list' value, then the priority could be below some machine default of 128, or? > I am fine either way - boolean properties or numbers, with a personal > preference for numbers as more flexible. Same here. Time to go to the DT list probably. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: