linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:12:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160415141242.GM22906@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5710F653.5070301@arm.com>

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:10:27PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 14/04/16 18:49, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >On 14/04/16 18:39, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:24:13PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>>CPU Errata work arounds are detected and applied to the
> >>>kernel code at boot time and the data is then freed up.
> >>>If a new hotplugged CPU requires a work around which
> >>>was not applied at boot time, there is nothing we can
> >>>do but simply fail the booting.
> >>
> >>Hmm, wouldn't it be better not to free the alternative text for errata
> >>workarounds instead?
> >
> >We could. I don't have a strong opinion. If there are no objections, I could
> >adopt it.
> 
> The alternatives have been merged to .init by :
> 
> commit 9aa4ec1571da6236 ("arm64: mm: fold alternatives into .init")
> 
> Mark,
> 
> Do you have any concerns on applying alternatives for CPUs turned online later ?
> We have to revert the patch above to get going

Well, note that I'm only suggesting that we keep the alternatives for
CPU errata workarounds.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-15 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-06 11:24 [PATCH 0/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=n Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: Add scope for capability check Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-14 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-14 17:47     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-15 12:55       ` Will Deacon
2016-04-15 13:26         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: Allow a capability to be checked on a single CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] irqchip/gic: Restore CPU interface checking Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-14 17:39   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-14 17:49     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-15 14:10       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-15 14:12         ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-04-18 13:41           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=N Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-07  9:18   ` James Morse
2016-04-07  9:26     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-07 10:07     ` [UPDATED] " Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160415141242.GM22906@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).