linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C clock prepared
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 18:11:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160416161147.GA2794@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460757887-18128-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:04:47PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The exynos5 I2C controller driver always prepares and enables a clock
> before using it and then disables unprepares it when the clock is not
> used anymore.
> 
> But this can cause a possible ABBA deadlock in some scenarios since a
> driver that uses regmap to access its I2C registers, will first grab
> the regmap lock and then the I2C xfer function will grab the prepare
> lock when preparing the I2C clock. But since the clock driver also
> uses regmap for I2C accesses, preparing a clock will first grab the
> prepare lock and then the regmap lock when using the regmap API.
> 
> An example of this happens on the Exynos5422 Odroid XU board where a
> s2mps11 PMIC is used and both the s2mps11 regulators and clk drivers
> share the same I2C regmap.
> 
> The possible deadlock is reported by the kernel lockdep:
> 
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
>    lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
>                                 lock(prepare_lock);
>                                 lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
>    lock(prepare_lock);
> 
>   *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> Fix this by only preparing the clock on probe and {en,dis}able in the
> rest of the driver.
> 
> This patch is similar to commit 34e81ad5f0b6 ("i2c: s3c2410: fix ABBA
> deadlock by keeping clock prepared") that fixes the same bug in other
> driver for an I2C controller found in Samsung SoCs.

I wish this would be fixed by introducing more granular clock locks
(e.g. per controller) instead of implementing another workaround.
I think this driver shouldn't care about this deadlock... although I see
that this is the simplest solution for now.

> 
> Reported-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> index b29c7500461a..602633747149 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> @@ -671,7 +671,9 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>  		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  
> -	clk_prepare_enable(i2c->clk);
> +	ret = clk_enable(i2c->clk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < num; i++, msgs++) {
>  		stop = (i == num - 1);
> @@ -695,7 +697,7 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>  	}
>  
>   out:
> -	clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk);
> +	clk_disable(i2c->clk);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -799,6 +801,10 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
>  
> +	clk_disable(i2c->clk);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
>   err_clk:
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -810,6 +816,8 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	i2c_del_adapter(&i2c->adap);
>  
> +	clk_unprepare(i2c->clk);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

Please unprepare the clock when suspending. There is no point of having
it prepared in that level.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-16 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-15 22:04 [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C clock prepared Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-16 12:15 ` Anand Moon
2016-04-17  0:40   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-16 16:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-04-17  0:58   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-17 13:29     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-18  7:50 ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-04-18 13:29   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-18 19:18     ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160416161147.GA2794@kozik-lap \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).