From: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com (Jerin Jacob)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: pci: add support for pci_mmap_page_range
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 19:31:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160418140119.GB5639@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4265693.nXcsYZd1B2@wuerfel>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 08:45:20PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2016 14:09:53 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 02:40:56AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > Certain X11 servers and user space network drivers frameworks
> > > need PCI mmaped /sys/bus/pci/devices/B:D:F/resourceX file to
> > > access PCI bar address space from user space.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Rebased to 4.6.0-rc3.
> > > - Tested and verified the change on Thunderx and xgene1 arm64 platforms
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 6 ++++++
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> > > index b9a7ba9..9d7e460 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> > > @@ -37,5 +37,11 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > > }
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
> > >
> > > +#define HAVE_PCI_MMAP
> >
> > By defining this symbol, we also get lumbered with the legacy /proc
> > interface, which I'd be keen to avoid exposing until we have people
> > explicitly asking for it.
> >
> > Any chance you could expose only the /sysfs interface on arm64?
> >
>
> Do we have an idea how much user space code is affected by this?
> Maybe it can instead be changed to use VFIO, which is basically
> the current way to do this.
Yes, after the introduction of vfio-noiommu mode almost all
uses case can be addressed with vfio. But still their are userspace
applications uses /sysfs scheme.
Regarding existing user space applications,
AFAIK, DPDK has the feature to support both /sysfs and vifo scheme.
X11 uses only /sysfs scheme.
IMO, Nothing wrong in providing this feature in arm64 kernel.
Except arm64, almost all the major architecture has this support.
Jerin
>
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-13 21:10 [PATCH v2] arm64: pci: add support for pci_mmap_page_range Jerin Jacob
2016-04-15 13:09 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-15 18:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:01 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-04-18 14:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:53 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-04-18 15:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 15:21 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-04-18 15:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 15:40 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-18 17:45 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-04-18 17:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-15 21:01 ` David Woodhouse
2017-03-20 13:18 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-20 14:07 ` David Woodhouse
2016-04-18 13:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-03-16 12:17 ` David Woodhouse
2017-03-20 13:21 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160418140119.GB5639@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox