From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:11:51 +0100 Subject: [v8, 1/7] Documentation: DT: update Freescale DCFG compatible In-Reply-To: <1461306464-19521-2-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> References: <1461306464-19521-1-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> <1461306464-19521-2-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> Message-ID: <20160422131151.GJ10606@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:27:38PM +0800, Yangbo Lu wrote: > Update Freescale DCFG compatible with 'fsl,-dcfg' instead > of 'fsl,ls1021a-dcfg' to include more chips. > > Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu > --- > Changes for v8: > - Added this patch > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt > index 752a685..1d5f512 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Freescale DCFG > configuration and status for the device. Such as setting the secondary > core start address and release the secondary core from holdoff and startup. > Required properties: > - - compatible: should be "fsl,ls1021a-dcfg" > + - compatible: should be "fsl,-dcfg" Please list specific values expected for , while jusy saying may be more generic, it makes it practically impossible to search for the correct binding given a compatible string, and it's vague as to exaclty what should be. Thanks, Mark. > - reg : should contain base address and length of DCFG memory-mapped registers > > Example: > -- > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >