From: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk (Matt Fleming)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] efi/arm-init: reserve rather than unmap the memory map for ARM as well
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 20:57:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160424195744.GL2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461165635-8041-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On Wed, 20 Apr, at 05:20:35PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Now that ARM has a fully functional memremap() implementation, there is
> no longer a need to remove the UEFI memory map from the linear mapping
> in order to be able to create a permanent mapping for it using generic
> code.
>
> So remove the 'IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM)' conditional we added in commit
> 7cc8cbcf82d1 ("efi/arm64: Don't apply MEMBLOCK_NOMAP to UEFI memory map
> mapping"), and revert to using memblock_reserve() for both ARM and arm64
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> This is the permanent fix I alluded to in the commit log for the patch
> mentioned above. Russell has pulled the memremap() patches so this is
> good to go for v4.7
>
> Note that current efi-next already has a conflict with v4.6-rc4 (where
> that patch landed) which will get even worse with this on top, so it may
> make sense to rebase efi-next onto v4.6-rc4 before pulling this
> (but note that this patch depends on 'efi/arm*: Use memremap() to create
> the persistent memmap mapping', so please don't reorder them to maintain
> bisectability)
Good notes, thanks Ard.
I applied this for v4.7 but please check the result since there was a
conflict with the GOP framebuffer patches,
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git/commit/?h=next&id=b2757153ee7cfce23f760036b0c85bd0ec99cf50
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-24 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 15:20 [PATCH] efi/arm-init: reserve rather than unmap the memory map for ARM as well Ard Biesheuvel
2016-04-24 19:57 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-04-25 8:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160424195744.GL2829@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).