[PATCH] make dt_scan_depth1_nodes more readable

[will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:24:03PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:04:53PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:25:11AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Improve the readability of dt_scan_depth1_nodes by removing the nested
> > > > > conditionals.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > Note: this patch is based on xentip/for-linus-4.7
> > > > 
> > > > So how should I merge it? :/
> > > 
> > > I think that if you would like to merge it, it would be easier this time
> > > for me to carry it in my tree. Otherwise you would have to base your
> > > for-linus-4.7 on xentip/for-linus-4.7 and send the pull request after
> > > the Xen pull request -- undesirable.
> > 
> > Ok, doesn't look like we'll run into conflicts. I just find it weird that
> > you'd have a patch with no functional change as a dependency, hence my
> > preference to queue it in the arm64 tree (where conflicts are more likely).
>  
> I see, that makes sense. In that case, would you be happy to take:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git/commit/?h=for-linus-4.7&id=df115bb0a0b8ad2f6dc62f8d094c21e77b367e7c
> 
> in your tree? That would get rid of any cross dependecies between the
> two tree.

I can take that and the other patch on top too.

Will