From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:12:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6 5/7] arm64/perf: Access pmu register using _sys_reg In-Reply-To: <20160425130637.GA29160@arm.com> References: <1461243525-13603-1-git-send-email-ashoks@broadcom.com> <1461243525-13603-6-git-send-email-ashoks@broadcom.com> <20160425130637.GA29160@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160425131238.GA30830@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:06:37PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 05:58:43AM -0700, Ashok Kumar wrote: > > changed pmu register access to make use of _sys_reg > > from sysreg.h instead of accessing them directly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ashok Kumar > > Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > This doesn't apply on top of -rc1 + the first four patches in your series. > What am I missing? ... the kvm changes, which we merged for -rc2. Sorry for the noise, I'll base this on -rc3 (to match the for-next/core branch). Will