linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Decouple context format from kernel config
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:41:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425134108.GD30830@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571E1851.2030400@arm.com>

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:14:57PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 25/04/16 12:02, Will Deacon wrote:
> >In what case would you not have a viable AArch64 granule, but the option
> >of falling back to AArch32 makes things work?
> 
> A 4KB page kernel with MMU-401, whose only supported AArch64 granule is
> supposedly 64KB.

That doesn't sound right at all!

> >>Plus we'd have to remove the LPAE page sizes
> >>from the bitmap beforehand in the case we don't support AARCH64_4K lest we
> >>end up with a phantom format the hardware doesn't actually do, and it all
> >>starts getting rather horrible...
> >
> >I'm not following. The io-pgtable code shouldn't give you back a phanton
> >format.
> 
> If you call alloc_io_pgtable_ops() with ARM_64_LPAE_S2 and an unmolested
> MMU-401 pgsize_bitmap, you get back a 4K granule v8 pagetable, which per a
> strict reading of the TRM isn't supported (although does appear to work in
> practice...)

I suspect that's a badly worded/incorrect TRM. In reality, I'd be happy
to assume that a given granule is supported across all formats (in as
much as it can be) if it's supported by one of them, but acknowledge
that's not guaranteed by the architecture.

> Consider also a stage 1 SMMU supporting all formats but only with 4K
> granules: with a 64K page arm64 kernel, the presence of AARCH64_4K support
> would lead us into arm_64_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s1(), which would be tricked
> into giving us back a 64K granule v8 format by the short descriptor large
> page size matching PAGE_SIZE, and things would definitely go downhill from
> there.

We could improve this by having a separate pgsize_bitmap per format, and
passing the relevant one to the relevant page table constructor.

> Given that, I think the only truly safe thing to do is to pass an explicit
> granule in the io_pgtable_cfg and just get rid of the bitmap-based guessing
> in arm_lpae_restrict_pgsizes() - otherwise, we'd still have to pre-restrict
> the bitmap, making it pretty much redundant anyway. I'll have a hack at that

Actually, I think I prefer to go the other way. Let's try moving more of
this common logic into the io-pgtable code. For example, an IOMMU driver
could say "I support these formats, and these options (page sizes, quirks,
etc) for each format" and the io-pgtable code can choose the most
appropriate thing.

> - in the meantime please feel free to queue patches 1-3 if you're happy with
> them, as that part is still feature-complete without all this context stuff.

Queued those, thanks!

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-13 17:12 [PATCH 0/7] arm-smmu: Implementation and context format differentiation Robin Murphy
2016-04-13 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Differentiate specific implementations Robin Murphy
2016-04-13 21:15   ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-04-13 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert ThunderX workaround to new method Robin Murphy
2016-04-13 21:16   ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-04-13 17:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Work around MMU-500 prefetch errata Robin Murphy
2016-04-21 16:15   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-21 16:16   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-13 17:13 ` [PATCH 4/7] io-64-nonatomic: Add relaxed accessor variants Robin Murphy
2016-04-21 16:18   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 17:08     ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-25 13:32       ` Will Deacon
2016-04-25 15:21         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-25 15:28           ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-25 15:41             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-25 16:11               ` Will Deacon
2016-04-25 16:11   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 10:38   ` [PATCH v2] " Robin Murphy
2016-04-13 17:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Tidy up 64-bit/atomic I/O accesses Robin Murphy
2016-04-13 17:13 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Decouple context format from kernel config Robin Murphy
2016-04-21 16:30   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 17:38     ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-25 11:02       ` Will Deacon
2016-04-25 13:14         ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-25 13:41           ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-04-25 16:21             ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-28 16:12   ` [PATCH v2] " Robin Murphy
2016-04-13 17:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Support SMMUv1 64KB supplement Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160425134108.GD30830@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).