From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:03:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCHv3 1/5] efi/runtime-wrappers: detect FW irq flag corruption In-Reply-To: <20160425155922.GC2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1461591994-14918-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1461591994-14918-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <571E25B1.8070305@arm.com> <20160425141557.GA2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20160425142435.GB2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20160425142735.GA14974@leverpostej> <20160425155922.GC2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> Message-ID: <20160425160324.GB24831@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr, at 03:27:35PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > I have no strong preference so long as the code is correct. > > > > Another option is to get rid of the bool entirely: > > > > flags ^= cur_flags; > > if (!WARN_ON(flags & ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK)) > > return; > > OK, let's do the following because we need flags to be preserved for > printing, > > --- > > unsigned long cur_flags, mismatch; > > local_save_flags(cur_flags); > > mismatch = flags ^ cur_flags; > if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(mismatch & ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK)) > return; > Sure; that looks good to me. Cheers, Mark.